Breakthrough Blog
 
Tell them about the dream, Al!
Last week, Al Gore justly won the Nobel Peace Prize for his work demanding that we take a good hard look at the nightmare of global warming. It is, in his words, "a planetary emergency." The problem is that knowing about the nightmare isn't enough.

Share

The most quoted part of our essay, "The Death of Environmentalism," was that Martin Luther King didn't give the "I have a nightmare" speech for a reason. The "I have a dream" speech worked because people knew about the nightmare. What America needed was a positive vision of the future. It's time for Al Gore to tell the world about the dream.

Last week, Al Gore justly won the Nobel Peace Prize for his work demanding that we take a good hard look at the nightmare of global warming. It is, in his words, "a planetary emergency."

The problem is that knowing about the nightmare isn't enough. Fear is as apt to paralyze as motivate. Fear is like sugar for a four year-old: it produces a burst of energy that ends as quickly as it begins. Hope, by contrast, is sustainable. It can motivate whole lifetimes of action.

Today, in an extraordinary column in the New York Daily News, Errol Lewis makes the argument that Gore needs to leap from the nightmare to the dream.

"According to activists Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, authors of the new book "Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility," Gore's "scare 'em" approach illustrates a crisis of imagination in the environmental movement. . . With his well-deserved Nobel Peace Prize firmly in hand, former Vice President Al Gore should perform one final, monumental deed to advance his cause: Declare the environmental movement dead, and begin rebuilding it from scratch.

It's time for Al Gore to tell the world about the dream. There is room on this planet for all seven billion of us to live prosperous, free, and sustainable lives. We can accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy. And by doing so, we can bring the world together not by through sacrifice and suffering but rather through overcoming.

Right now we are on the road giving talks about our book. It's been an incredible experience. Hundreds of people are turning out for our book readings – 350 in Minneapolis alone. People are excited and passionate about this moment in history. They want to hear about the dream – and want to take action to make it real.

What we need to do is hard, not easy — expensive, not cheap. There's no use beating around the bush about it. Big challenges demand big solutions. But in doing it we will test the best of our abilities.

It's time for America to dream again

   Like what you see? Subscribe to our RSS feed here...


Share


TrackBacks (0) 6 COMMENTS:

I liked Obama's energy plan, and I hear you did as well. He almost gets it, and even some on the right almost get it. But it is still just an issue on the tic list. I think you were saying in your book that it is THE issue. If so, I agree. But no one has yet made a convincing case for that. Your book was only a start. Maybe the next one. Below is the URL for my review of "Breakthrough" in RenewableEnergyAcess.com
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/reinsider/story;jsessionid=D3CF6D4C656ED136B091B3A1734E3220?id=50262

Forget Al Gore, IPPC and Nobel

What could be better than tripping along Vancouver*s Robson street with great shops, coffee bars and friends Chevron and Exxon near by on a crystal clear sunny day?

After the fun on Robson and Denman in the west end one could drive over the Lionsgate bridge and take the gondola up Grouse mountain. Be a tourist for a day.

Looking down on Vancouver we can see the city is under a nicotine colored dome cloud. That seems odd. We just came from downtown and could swear the blue sky sunny day was crystal clear.

We know the pollution cloud that cities live under around the world cause massive pressure on health care costs. But what the heck; life is sure great today while the sun shines. Where does one start to reduce pollution anyway? Why bother?

One would have to work against the world*s richest and most powerful corporations, Exxon, Chevron and GM for electric and compressed air transportation.

One would have to convince friends that a range of 250 kilometers between fill-ups rather than 500 km is not an impossible hardship. Hybrids and bio fuels are helpful intrim solutions and they do reduce the demand for oil. The real solution though is the electric or compressed air car.

We often see a 1993 Honda Insight driving around town here in Courtenay BC. The driver is always smiling. He NEVER has to buy, pump or even smell gasoline. The Insight gets an estimated 80 to 120 mpg. Seems like magic, when it uses no gas at all.

Uh, OK, so that must be the pro-rated consumption taking materials and manufacture into account.

Big Oil and Government can dial in any oil/gas price they wish while bombs go off over Mid-East oil reserves. GM will make and sell hybrids as long as it keeps old-fashioned ICE engines on the highways. They do not want to give in to the simple, [ one moving part ], electric motor.

Guess the nicotine colored cloud enveloping cities around the world will remain. Too bad. = TG

PS: Tata motors [India],makes cars that run on compressed air. Taxis in Paris run on compessed air.

While hybrids and biofuel vehicles are stop-gap measures for North America, battery operated cars [PEVs], and trucks are the enviro answer.

Government collects road taxes today as a cut of pumped gas and diesel.

To speed the wide use of EVs a new road tax collection method is required.

The government could collect that tax bi-monthly buy reading EV odomometers and charging only for miles travelled.

Low overhead drive through kiosks could be all that is required. = TG

Heard about Breakthrough on Canadian CBC radio.

Googled *Breakthrough* and there you were, only five or six down from the top. = TG

Not really a comment on your blog, but primarily a question. First, I was at the Policy and a Pint discussion in Minneapolis this week. I had a great time listening, and due to the number of people who surrounded you at the end, I was unable to ask the following: Is your desire in creating this new way to address environmental health a top-down or bottom up approach? And second, what are your ideas on the never ending conflict where a large percentage of the population believes that any environment exists solely for utilization, and the other belief that we are simply on this earth as stewards? Lastly, I just read an article in the WSJ by Daniel Botkin where he is stating that Global Warming proponents may be exaggerating the impacts in order to get society to change. What do you think?

Al Gore has been offering solutions for years.
Anyone can easily find evidence of his work online. Every time Al Gore advances his work, the current of negativity begins flowing, don't let it shock you.

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use basic HTML tags for style)
Use the <br> tag for line breaks (returns).

HTML is allowed, but in an effort to prevent SPAM if your entry contains URL's it will be held briefly for moderation.

Please email comments@thebreakthrough.org if you're experiencing problems when trying to comment.

Breakthrough Blog
RSS Subscribe to RSS Feed

twitter Follow the BTI on Twitter

twitter Join the BTI on Facebook

donate to Breakthrough

Recent Breakthrough Blog Posts

While Japan turns away from nuclear power, South Korea sticks to its path

Where the Shale Gas Revolution Came From

Interview with Alex Crawley, Former Program Director for the Energy Research and Development Administration

National Journal Highlights "Beyond Boom and Bust" in Weekly Forum

Germany Returns to Coal

Archives
Categories
Contributors

Blog advertisement
Nau Clothing
 
 
Privacy : Contact