Don't you ever wonder how you found yourself to be advocating for clean energy? How you end up glued to progressive blogs and the New York Times, sometimes at odd hours of the day/night, constantly searching for information relating to Obama, the latest on cap-and-insert new word here, or wind turbines?
by Lindsey Franklin, Breakthrough Generation Fellow
Don't you ever wonder how you found yourself to be advocating for clean energy? How you end up glued to progressive blogs and the New York Times, sometimes at odd hours of the day/night, constantly searching for information relating to Obama, the latest on cap-and-insert new word here, or wind turbines? Or, how we all ended up in this kind of wonkish section of the population where we actually need to remind ourselves that the world does not revolve around what exactly Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky says about the Climate Security Act?

Much study has been done to try to figure out what connects conservative America into a cohesive voting bloc, and the underlying philosophies and psychological wiring behind it. Understanding the fundamental values within the conservative population and the psychology of the people who hold them led to a well-funded, organized and ultimately successful effort to tilt the political balance to the right. Progressives, who traditionally have focused on issue-based instead of value-based politics, are certainly coming around to the advantages this level of self-awareness. And, we've made a lot of headway into making our movement profound, powerful and connected.
For a few years now, I have been trying to figure out how my political ideology connects to my personal philosophy, and even the basic tenets of my personality. I want to tie the whole thing together in a personal credo -- reflecting the classic narcissist's self-indulgent desire to examine herself in a way that gives her own life meaning. Yet perhaps a bit of reflection provides more than just a self-serving massaging of one's own ego; if we can all look deeply into our personal values and the founding life philosophy behind our actions, we can see where we connect, where we differ, and ultimately how to build a movement aware of itself enough to develop its strengths and grapple with its differences.
For me, I know I am first and foremost an optimist. Not only am I constantly made fun of for saying "I like...(chocolate, social movements, mountains, various boys, Spinoza... fill in the blank)," but I also truly believe that humans are progressing as a species and can progress steadily into the future. I want to help the world boldly step into its own potential, and find creative, innovative ways to do so.
I also know that the universe around us completely inspires me. I am awed by the sheer vastness of the natural world and feel a profound love for humanity, with all its strengths and pitfalls. Rand's Fountainhead, and the triumph of humanity that it celebrates, captivates me. Yet I admire Leopold's humble understanding of ecology and McKibben's nuanced and critical insight into the world we have created.
I am probably a utilitarian, for better or worse. Economic thinking resonates with me for its macro-level perspective that it has on the world, identifying where we are, for lack of better words, "maximizing the good." While I understand the draw to right-based ethics, I ultimately resonate more with Singer and Stewart Mill than Hobbes and Locke.
So that's me, my basic ideology, in a nutshell. These elements of myself have been central to my involvement with the climate movement and my fascination with the opportunity that a clean energy economy provides. I'm sure you differ dramatically in some places (Ayn Rand? Really?) yet recognize yourself in others. I love the idea of all of us coming from different viewpoints, causing tensions at times and moments of inspiration at others, to find ourselves in this crazy movement, together.
I think many people who feel drawn to this movement don't have any ideology to speak of. They're just quite informed about the happenings in their community and in the world - and importantly - dare to follow their hearts. You don't need an ideology to have trouble with ecosystem destruction, social injustice or whatever. It just feels wrong, for everyone.
I read lots of books, and even more blogs, but I've never read Singer, Mill, Locke or Hobbes, nor do I plan to. It may sound harsh, but I don't really care what they said. They were probably right, to some extend. :)
I'm a practical guy. I want to know what's happening, what's good, what's bad, and how we can get more of the good and less of the bad. By the time all the non-ideological issues are gone we're almost in utopia.
Just for example: Abortion... sucks. I can understand both pro-life and pro-choice arguments. It may be a question we'll never resolve, but I would thank heaven on my knees if abortion would be the only issue we'd have to talk about.
Nevertheless, it's good to discuss what binds us. I don't think it are age-old philosophers though.
I think it's something far more tacit, intangible. I think people are moved emotionally, and this can't be captured in words. We just want a better world.
I thought the Breakthrough book cited Nietzsche at some point. I guess you could call me an existentialist. If you don't accept any external meaning, you have to make meaning yourself, and I find this meaning in both living and care for life. But I think that's only human.
So could the progressive movement be bound just by our common humanity?
Posted by: Meryn Stol at June 9, 2008 9:27 PM