Analysis
MAHA
Our position
The Make America Healthy Again movement is not a break from environmentalism, it’s an extension of its long tolerance for quackery. While diet-related chronic disease is a genuine crisis in wealthy countries, MAHA’s prescriptions for it are nostalgic nonsense: banning pesticides, treating seed oils as inherently harmful, and replacing industrial agriculture with organic and regenerative farming. These proposed shifts would raise food prices, expand agriculture’s land footprint, and worsen both environmental and human health outcomes. MAHA’s fixation with seed oils and pesticides diverts attention from serious public health concerns and makes healthy food less affordable.
Questions
What is MAHA?
MAHA, or “Make America Healthy Again,” is a political and public-health movement associated with Robert F. Kennedy Jr that grew out of the anti-vaccine movement. It argues that chronic disease is driven partly by diet, environmental exposures, and the food system, and advocates changes to food, agricultural, chemical, and health policy.
Are seed oils bad for you?
No. Evidence does not show that seed oils–which are fats extracted from plant seeds, including canola, soybean, and sunflower–are inherently harmful. Seed oils contain unsaturated fats and when replacing saturated fats, they can support heart health. Like any calorie-dense food, however, excessive consumption can contribute to an unhealthy diet.
What is the MAHA diet?
There is no official “MAHA diet,” but the movement generally promotes whole foods, meat, dairy, fruits, and vegetables while discouraging ultra-processed foods, added sugars, and some food additives. Some MAHA advocates also encourage eating organic and avoiding seed oils, although evidence that seed oils are inherently harmful is weak.
Is MAHA just the right-wing version of the progressive food movement?
Both MAHA and left-leaning food advocates target corporate food systems. Traditional progressive food movements often focus on government regulation, corporate oversight, and structural access, whereas MAHA leans heavily on individual responsibility and lifestyle choices and tends to embrace alternative wellness positions.
Start here
Two pieces the team says to read first
MAHA work
Research, analysis and everything we have put on the record: comments, testimony, statements, letters and endorsements.
Showing 7–10 of 10
Sort Newest Oldest
Analysis
Mythbusting MAHA: A Reality Check on Glyphosate
A hypothetical glyphosate ban would backfire, with consequences for human health and the environment
· Emily Bass
Analysis
Mythbusting MAHA’s claims about food and farming
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his HHS are on a public health crusade that is largely a distraction
· Emily Bass
Analysis
Quackery Is As Quackery Does
Environmental Chickens Come Home To Roost With RFK Jr’s Confirmation
· Ted Nordhaus
Analysis
Can RFK Kneecap American Agriculture?
The Worst Version of the Nightmare is Over, But We’re Not Out of the Woods Yet
· Alex Smith
7–10 of 10