Analysis
Animal Agriculture
Our position
Over the course of history, humanity has serially shifted toward animal agricultural systems that are more resource-efficient and better able to meet the dietary demands of a growing population: from hunting wild animals, to raising domesticated livestock on extensive pastures, to selectively breeding and genetically altering species to confine in feedlots and other intensive systems that yield a lower environmental impact per calorie. Global demand for animal protein is rising and will continue to rise as more people leave the bonds of poverty, indicating that supply-side changes to how livestock are raised are critical to mitigating the problems of animal agriculture. Continuing to improve the environmental impacts of animal agriculture requires more technology, more intensification, and more artificial forms of producing and acquiring animal protein for human diets.
Questions
What are “factory farms”? Are they bad?
“Factory farms” are concentrated animal feeding operations. They tend to be worse on animal welfare metrics, but far better than pasture-raised alternatives for emissions, land-use, and price. Abolishing “factory farms” without significant reductions in meat consumption would raise global emissions and tropical deforestation by shifting production to lower-productivity systems.
Is grassfed beef better for the environment than grainfed beef?
No. Grass-finished cattle gain weight more slowly and occupy land longer, meaning that meat from grass-fed operations have an average of 42% higher carbon footprints than grain-finished alternatives.
Can lab-grown meat disrupt the meat industry?
Not soon. Lab-grown, or cultivated, meat companies have only barely begun commercializing their products, which continue to be more expensive than conventional products. In the long-run, cultivated meat could take some market share, but only if the product can compete on taste and price.
If I care about climate change, should I become vegan?
You don’t have to go vegan to dramatically reduce the climate impact of your diet. While vegan diets often have the lowest carbon footprint, the biggest climate benefit comes from cutting beef, dairy, and other ruminant products. A diet with chicken and pork but no beef or dairy often emits less than a vegetarian diet with substantial amounts of milk and cheese.
Start here
Three pieces the team says to read first
Animal Agriculture work
Research, analysis and everything we have put on the record: comments, testimony, statements, letters and endorsements.
Showing 13–18 of 38
Sort Newest Oldest
Analysis
Livestock Don’t Contribute 14.5% of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The total is far less certain. But reducing their emissions is more important than ever
· Dan Blaustein-Rejto, Chris Gambino
Analysis
How to Make Alternative Proteins More Than a Fad
This year’s XPRIZE shows continued innovation may help alternative meats live up to the hype
· Dan Blaustein-Rejto
Analysis
Is Tucker Carlson Right About Cow Masks?
Unmasking the truth about livestock methane emissions and measurement.
· Chris Gambino
Analysis
To Decarbonize Food Production, Congress Must Invest in R&D
To address the large environmental challenges facing US agriculture, R&D funding will need to be at least doubled.
· Dan Blaustein-Rejto, Emily Bass
Report
American National Competitiveness and the Future of Meat
Why the United States Needs to Build Up a Domestic Alternative Proteins Industry
· Ariel Ron, Alex Smith
Analysis
Are Alternative Proteins a Climate Solution?
Yes, if Carbon Opportunity Cost is considered
· Saloni Shah
13–18 of 38