Climate Pragmatism: Innovation, Resilience and No Regrets
A pragmatic strategy to restart stalled global climate efforts through the pursuit of energy innovation, climate resilience, and no regrets pollution reduction (Report Overview)
Email | Download Hi-Resolution Picture
Daniel Sarewitz is Professor of Science and Society and Co-Founder and Co-Director of the Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes (CSPO), at Arizona State University. His work focuses on revealing the connections between science policy decisions, scientific research and social outcomes. How does the distribution of the social benefits of science relate to the way that we organize scientific inquiry? What accounts for the highly uneven advance of know-how related to solving human problems? How do the interactions between scientific uncertainty and human values influence decision making? How does technological innovation influence politics? And how can improved insight into such questions contribute to improved real-world practice? Among a variety of previous positions, he worked on R&D policy issues for the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology from 1989-1993. He received a Ph.D. in Geological Sciences from Cornell University in 1986. He now directs the Washington, DC, office of CSPO, and concentrates his efforts on increasing CSPO's impact on federal science and technology policy processes. His latest book is The Techno-Human Condition (MIT Press, 2011; co-authored with Braden Allenby); he is also a regular columnist for Nature magazine.
Watch Sarewitz explain "Two Approaches to Climate Change: Technology Unites While Science Divides"
"Learning to Live With Fossil Fuels," The Atlantic (May 2013)
"Science Must Been Seen to Bridge the Political Divide," Nature (January 2013)
"Beware the Creeping Cracks of Bias," Nature (May 2012)
"The Trouble With Climate Science," Slate (March 2010)