Reducing the Environmental Impact of Global Diets

New Paper Points to Intensification of Meat Production

{photo_credit}

August 30, 2017 | Linus Blomqvist, Marian Swain, James McNamara, William J. Ripple,

Accounting for nearly one-third of global land use and 14 percent of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, meat production weighs heavily on the global environment, and beef production most of all. Comprising 41 percent of total livestock sector emissions, beef production is responsible for pasture that spans a quarter of the world’s land area and threatens further expansion in biodiversity hotspots like the Brazilian Amazon. It makes sense, therefore, that calls to reduce global beef consumption have gained increasing prominence among environmentalists as a way to decrease emissions and spare high-priority land.

But according to a new peer-reviewed paper in Science of the Total Environment—co-authored by Breakthrough’s Marian Swain, James McNamara, and Linus Blomqvist, along with ecologist William Ripple at Oregon State—demand-side efforts to reduce meat consumption will not be nearly enough to confront the environmental impacts of livestock over the next century, especially as meat demand in the developing world continues to grow.

Read the paper: Reducing the Environmental Impact of Global Diets

Improving the environmental efficiency of livestock production systems through intensification, on the other hand, while little discussed, holds significant potential to mitigate the impact of the sector. Intensive beef production in particular, in which cattle finish their lives on grain-based feeds in highly controlled environments, dramatically reduces time to slaughter, and thus methane emissions, as compared with extensive, pasture-only systems.

GHG emissions for animal and vegetable protein sources


Data source: Nijdam et al. 2012

Intensive beef production systems also boast lower land-use intensity than do extensive systems, an especially important finding for developing regions, where intensification could prevent pasture expansion and land conversion even as meat demand continues to rise.

Land-use intensity of animal and vegetable protein sources


Data source: Nijdam et al. 2012

There are certainly trade-offs to intensification, including excessive antibiotic use, local pollution, and animal welfare. But there are also surprising synergies that emerge from some of the practices that improve productivity, including selective breeding and modern veterinary care. With appropriate management and effective policies in place, intensification has the potential to vastly improve the environmental performance of meat production around the world. Dietary preferences will also play a role, but for the sake of global conservation and the climate, it will be essential to keep intensification in view.

 

To access the article, please email the authors directly here.

 

Read more:


Comments

THE FUTURE OF FOOD

A Breakthrough Series

 

An Introduction: The Future of Food
by Ted Nordhaus


 

Is Precision Agriculture the Way to Peak Cropland?
by Linus Blomqvist and David Douglas


 

The Future of Meat
by Marian Swain


 

Food Production and Wildlife on Farmland
by Linus Blomqvist


 

Plenty of Fish on the Farm
by Marian Swain

 

 

subscribe to our Food & Farming newsletter

PUBLICATIONS

 

Nature Unbound

by Linus Blomqvist

 

 


FURTHER READING

 

The Environmental Case for Industrial Agriculture

by Ted Nordhaus

 

How Land-Efficient Is Organic Agriculture?

by Mark Lynas

 

The Future of Food

by Michael Lind

 

A Marriage of Two Agricultures

by Jason Sibert

 

Beyond Food and Evil

by Emma Marris